Category: CliftonStrengths

Coaching for the Brilliantly Wired and Uniquely Weird

  • Vertical and horizontal Assessments

    There are many psychometric assessments on the market today. Let’s name a few of the more famous ones:

    Myers Briggs Type Indicator MBTI, based on Carl Gustav Jung’s typology, with 16 types along the dichotomies of

    • introversion vs. extraversion
    • intuition vs. sensory
    • thinking vs. feeling
    • perceiving vs. judging

    The Enneagram, based of the work of Georges I. Gurdjieff, with 9 types along base motivations or survival strategies in three centres of thinking

    • heart: 2 helper, 3 achiever, 4 individualist
    • head: 5 observer, 6 loyal sceptic, 7 enthusiast
    • gut: 8 challenger, 9 peacemaker, 1 reformer

    CliftonStrengths, based on the work of Donald Clifton and Gallup, with 34 innate talent themes in 4 domains

    • strategic thinking
    • relationship building
    • influencing
    • execution

    DISC, based on the work of Moulton Marston, with 4 behavioural styles

    • Dominant
    • Inspiring
    • Supportive
    • Cautious

    Spiral Dynamics, based on the work of Clare W. Graves and Don Beck, with at the time 9 value memes of the evolution of human consciousness

    • Beige: survival
    • Purple: safety, magic
    • Red: power, dominance
    • Blue: order, right & wrong
    • Orange: autonomy, achievement
    • Green: approval, equality, community
    • Yellow: adaptability, integration
    • Turquoise: compassion, oneness
    • coral: yet to come

    But there is a crucial difference between the first four assessments and the last.

    Let’s start with the last one.

    Spiral Dynamics describes a path of development both humanity as well as a single individual undertake in their evolutionary growth.

    Each stage, level, or as they are called in the theory, vMeme for value memes knows how to deal with life’s circumstances it is faced with.

    If those circumstances change, people must adjust and become more conscious of new problems and capable of solving them, while not losing, but integrating the old values and solutions.

    • People with a Purple tribal value system, looking for safety in the group, need some more tools when getting into conflict with other such groups. The Red warrior consciousness evolves.
    • The same is true for individuals: small children in the Purple safety of their family start to develop an adventurous, Red egotistical consciousness, necessary to make decisions, not losing the bond with the family that allows for this in the first place.

    Each of the vMeme changes can be explained by such changes in life circumstances and the responds brought forth.

    Rarely a person will outgrow the most complex vMeme in their surrounding society. Let’s name a few, and since I am a pastor in real life, I will depend on the biblical narrative for most of them:

    • Adam and Eve’s eyes were opened and they saw that they were naked. This describes humanity going from Beige proto-consciousness to Purple tribal consciousness.
    • Abraham was told to leave his town and family. This describes the change from Purple tribal to Red adventure and power consciousness.
    • Pharao and Moses: first Moses defeated Pharao in a power struggle (if there ever was one), and then God gave Moses the ten commandments. This describes the shift from Red power to Blue order and hierarchy consciousness.
    • Luther along with others like Zwingli, Calvin, Erasmus of Rotterdam created the notion of the individual. This describes the shift from Blue hierarchy and one truth to Orange autonomy, achievement and personal success consciousness.

    Such a developmental model is called vertical. It describes the growth of humanity and individuals towards more complexity of thinking, with each stage causing problems that cannot be solved with the kind of thinking that they were produced.

    Again, let me give you some examples:

    • The Red warrior and power vMeme produced tyrants that could only be tamed by a law given by a higher instance such that even the tyrant had to obey. Power gods were replaced by a monotheistic God.
    • Climate change and the destruction of our environment cannot be solved using the methods of Orange technology created for personal success, seeking autonomy and achievement. Climate change was brought to our attention by Green, but climate change is a problem so complex that it needs the Yellow integral solutions of every vMeme in sync to be solved.

    Now that we have a grip of such a vertical assessment, what are horizontal assessments then?

    Horizontal assessments measure and compare the individuals within one vMeme. Since those assessments were born from psychology, and psychology is a child of the Green vMeme, they usually were formed around the values of approval, equality in diversity, self-awareness and self-actualisation, and community.

    Some of them, like CliftonStrengths and MBTI, work into the layer of Orange, linking Green self-knowledge and growth to efficiency in teamwork and personal success.

    Some of them have even been adapted for Blue environments like churches, giving people an idea about where to fit into the hierarchy of the system.

    MBTI focusses mostly on Orange, CliftonStrengths on Blue, Orange, and Green, while DISC is often seen in Blue and Orange, and the Enneagram in Blue and Green, since it is to spiritual or esoteric for Orange to value it.

    Horizontal assessments often lose their value in other vMemes. Some can be adjusted through those vMemes with evolving definitions of their types.

    Let’s develop the Enneagram type 5 through the vMemes of Spiral Dynamics.

    • Purple 5: The Sage/The Ascetic
    • Red 5: The Sage/The Wizard
    • Blue 5: The Sage/The Teacher of the one Truth
    • Orange 5: The Sage/The Investigator
    • Green 5: The Sage/The Professor
    • Yellow 5: The Sage/The accompanying Mentor
    • Turquoise 5: The Sage/The Integrative Self

    As you can see, a 5 does have the same qualities of a sage, but develops them through the vMemes depending on life’s circumstances.

    The same is possible for the Enneagram and CliftonStrengths.

    • Tasks around ideal processes and systems (Angel Achiever)
    • Tasks that help others (Good Samaritan)
    • Tasks that are impossible (Super Stamina)
    • Tasks that express individuality (Prolific Creator)
    • Tasks that absorb, preserve, and (sometimes) use gained knowledge (Rare Find)
    • Tasks that secure trust and collaboration (Safety Officer)
    • Tasks of fun and adventure (Trailer Blazer)
    • Tasks that make an impact (Shock Waves)
    • Tasks that keep everyone happy (Eager Pacifier)

    And them again for CliftonStrengths and Spiral Dynamics, shown here with the learner talent theme.

    • Beige: in survival mode, there is no learning or teaching
    • Purple: seeks knowledge from wise and elders and accepts things at face value as well as sees magic connections.
    • Red: learns through teal and error, seeks instant reward and wants to avoid shame. Consequences are ignored.
    • Blue: likes to be “fed” abstract realities and needs absolute truth. Learns to contribute to the order of things and avoid upsetting rulers and God. Teachers are authorities in traditional school environment.
    • Orange: learns to be successful. Driven by market and demand, wants to have cRedentials to gain advantage. Teachers are experts and coaches in universities and business.
    • Green: learns to upset the system. Values non-hierarchical team-oriented learning environment with life coaches.
    • Yellow: desires to be a generalist with self-paced learning and individual curriculums. Teachers are mentors that accompany others, reflectors and learning facilitators. Yellow chooses a competent coach and accepts her guidance within the context of coaching, while remaining autonomous.

    In my coaching, I am using CliftonStrengths, the Enneagram, and Spiral Dynamics to develop a well rounded picture of the person I am coaching.

    You will get your strengths and how to apply them successfully as well as deal with your weaknesses from CliftonStrengths Full 34 Report.

    You will know your motivations, survival strategies, dark and golden shadows from the Enneagram.

    And you will get to know your individual chord of vMemes with your center of gravity, the worldview you are acting from.

  • CliftonStrengths Domain Statistics

    There are four domains in CliftonStrengths. According to Gallup,

    • Strategic Thinking themes help you absorb and analyze information that informs better decisions.
    • Relationship Building themes help you build strong relationships that hold a team together.
    • Execution themes help you make things happen.
    • Influencing themes help you take charge, speak up and make sure others are heard.

    Strategic Thinking contains eight talent themes:

    • Analytical
    • Context
    • Futuristic
    • Ideation
    • Input
    • Intellection
    • Learner
    • Strategic

    Relationship Building contains nine talent themes:

    • Adaptability
    • Connectedness
    • Developer
    • Empathy
    • Harmony
    • Includer
    • Individualization
    • Positivity
    • Relator

    Executing contains 9 talent themes:

    • Achiever
    • Arranger
    • Belief
    • Consistency
    • Deliberative
    • discipline
    • Focus
    • Responsibility
    • Restorative

    Influencing contains 8 talent themes:

    • Activator
    • Command
    • Communication
    • Competition
    • Maximizer
    • Self-Assurance
    • Significance
    • WOO

    Any combination of talent themes are possible and great! But what if I only have talent themes from one domain in my top 5?

    That is wonderful and no problem at all, as much as missing one or two domains in your top 5 is not a problem. First, we usually have more strengths we work fluently with than our top 5. Most people have 8 to 12 such dominant talent themes, with an average of 10.

    But even if you lack some domains within your dominant talent themes, it is not a problem. We can compensate and cooperate to fill those gaps.

    To compensate means to have one or multiple of your strengths mimic one you lack.

    If that does not work, cooperate with somebody that has that strength.

    Both strategies work for single talent themes and domains.

    But what are the odds of having only strengths of one domain in your top 5?

    For Strategic Thinking and Influencing:

    We want 5 of 8 strengths: 8!/(8-5)!. So there are 6720 combinations to do that. And there is 34!/(34-5!) = 33’390’720 of top 5 combinations all in all.

    So, the odds of drawing one of the pure combinations for strategic thinking are 6720 : 33’390’720, roughly 1: 4969.

    The same is true for influencing.

    For Executing and Relationship Building, there are 9 talent themes.

    Thus, we want 5 out of 9 strengths: 9!/(9-5)! = 15’120.

    So, the odds of drawing one of the pure combinations for Executing are 15’120 : 33’390’720, roughly 1: 2209.

    The same for Relationship Building.

    To have a pure set of any of those domains, we have to add the combinations:

    6720 Strategic Thinking + 6720 Influencing + 15’120 Executing + 15’120 Relationship Building.

    (8!/(8-5)! * 2 + 9!/(9-5!)*2) / (34!/(34-5)!)

    And that is roughly 1:765.

    So, one in about every 765 people statistically has only talent themes from one single domain in his top 5.

    Just as a reminder: this does not take into account that some strengths might be more frequent than others, but assigns all strengths the same probability.

    Nobody though has only talent themes of one domain in their top 10. Do you know why?

  • CliftonStrengths Statistics

    This is a question that is asked very often: What is the odds of somebody having the same strengths as I?

    First, let me tell you that this is just for fun. When coming up with the 34 talent themes, Donald Clifton chose them as they were emerging from the data and bundled the ones that were somewhat alike each other.

    Origin

    In short, the 34 were found by taking some 5000 items and narrowing them down to select the items with the strongest psychometric properties. That is, the ones that were best in distinguishing personality traits without being too limiting. Items excluded were either correlated to others, not adding to the results, or too selecting.

    1999 – The remaining items were bundled in 35 themes of similar items and data was collected for several months, revising it to 180 items bundled in 34 themes.

    2006 – another revision took place based on more than 1 million assessments to shape StrengthsFinder 2.0 with 34 themes and 177 items.

    The base question for primary collection of the 5000 items was: how can people work together more efficiently.

    While MBTI and Big 5 and such are theory based, CliftonStrengths is evidence based, that is constructed through data analysis: make tons of interviews and see what patterns emerge.

    Talent Theme Odds

    This, among other things, means that the different talent themes do not occur with the same odds, most probably.

    Even the theme frequency data Gallup provides for certified coaches points into that direction:

    All over the world, when 20’002’953 assessments were recorded, there were big differences.

    Achiever was in 31.22% of people’s top 5, while self-assurance only appeared in 4.52% of the cases.

    Yet, those assessments are, even in their great number, not a statistically valid sample as, among other reasons,

    • most have to take the assessment through their employer,
    • for the others, people with some talent themes might be less likely to take such an assessment in the first place.

    The probabilities I am going to calculate are based on normal distribution, that is, assuming that all talent themes appear with the same odds of 1/34.

    Why 1/34? When I randomly draw one strength of the 34 talent themes, I have 34 possible talent themes and therefore 34 possible results.

    Formulas

    When I want to draw 2 talent themes, what is the odds of that combination?

    For the first I draw I have 34 possible result, and for the second, the remaining 33, as I cannot have the same talent theme twice. There are 34 * 33 possible combinations of to talent themes then. So the odds of a combination of 2 is 1 : 34 * 33 = 1 : 1122.

    For top 5, that would be then 1 : (34 * 33 * 32 * 31 * 30) or 1 : 33’390’720. That is the famous 1 in 33 million often stated.

    There is a shorthand this can be written in – math has a shorthand for everything. Let’s develop what is called faculty and the binomial formula.

    Fixed order – Faculty

    Let’s calculate the number of combinations of all 34 talent themes. First place 34, second place 33, and so on until for the last place, there is only 1 talent theme left. That is 34 * 33 * 21 * … * 2 * 1. And that is the definition of 34! (faculty of 34), the product of all numbers from 1 to 34.

    There are 34! possible combinations of talent themes. That is 2.952327990396041e38 or roughly a 3 with 38 zeroes. The odds of another person having exactly your order of talent themes is 1 : 34!

    There are roughly 8 billion people on the planet. There are 3.69e28 times as many possible combinations of talent themes than people!

    Let’s get back to the top 5. How could this be written in shorthand?

    Ok, there are 34! combinations total. When I take away five strengths, there are 29 left. I can combine those 29 in 29! ways with the same math I have done for the 34.

    So for the 5 talent themes I have selected, there are 29! combinations on how the other talent themes can be combined. If I now divide the total of possible combinations with this number, I get the number of possible combinations of top5.

    Let’s illustrate this:

    34!/29! = 34!/(34-5)! = (34 * 33 * 32 * … * 1) / (29 * 28 * 27 * … * 1) = 34 * 33 * 32 * 31 * 30.

    Top 5 in fixed order: 34!/29! = 33’390’720

    So, again, but with a more usable formula, we have roughly one in 33 million sharing your top 5.

    This is the formula we used above.

    For top 10, use 34!/(34-10)!

    Random Order – Binomial Formula

    In all of these formulas, when we draw the first talent theme, it will stay in first rank.

    What now when we want to know how many combinations we can build if the talent themes just have to show up in any order?

    Well, when I have 5 talent themes, how many combinations are possible for those 5? Could it be 5! ? Most certainly it is, according to the theory above.

    We have 34!/29! possible combinations of top 5, and 5! possible combinations of those top 5 in any order. If I draw any top 5, 5! combinations will give me the same top 5.

    We have found the binomial formula:

    Top 5 in random order: 34!/(29! * 5!) = 278’256.

    So, one in 278’256 people share your top 5 in random order.

    Or, if going for top 10: 34!/ ((34-10)!(10!)).

    Four out of Five

    There are now 34!/(29!5!) possible combinations of top 5. What if we only care for 4 of them?

    There are 34!/(30!4!) possible combinations of top 4 in any order.

    If you look at that, there are 150 more possible combinations for top 5 that top 4.

    There are 5!/(4!1!) possible combinations of 4 talent themes within a set of 5. That is, surprisingly enough, 5 possibilities or 5 five spots where the talent theme can show up we do not care about.

    Thus, there are 34!/(30!4!) * 5!/(4!1!) possibilities of 4 out of 5 of a set of 34.

    That is 5’565’120.

    So, roughly one in 5.5 million people have 4 of your top 5 in common with you.

    Thus, there are 34!/(31!3!) * 5!/(3!2!) possibilities of 3 out of 5 of a set of 34.

    That is 59’840.

    So, one in 59’840 people have 3 of your top 5 in common with you.

    World Formula

    The world formula to calculate m out of n talent themes in common from a set of 34 talent themes therefore is (tada): (0! = 1)

    World formula in exact order: 34!/((34-m)!) * n!/((n-m)!m!)

    World formula in any order: 34!/((34-m)!m!) * n!/((n-m)!m!)

    I am sure I lost most of my readers on the way, so: congratulations, if you made it that far!